as tested by core/iwasm/libraries/wasi-nn/test/test_tensorflow.c,
the legacy "wasi_nn" abi uses the number of fp32 for get_output.
because these backends don't implement the abi, bail out explicitly
in build time.
cf.
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/issues/4376
* Follow-up to PR #4300: prevent potential overflow
PR #4300 introduced the rationale for validating heap_type.
This patch moves the validation before the computation of
type1 to prevent potential overflow.
Propose two enhancements:
- Shared heap created from preallocated memory buffer: The user can create a shared heap from a pre-allocated buffer and see that memory region as one large chunk; there's no need to dynamically manage it(malloc/free). The user needs to make sure the native address and size of that memory region are valid.
- Introduce shared heap chain: The user can create a shared heap chain, from the wasm app point of view, it's still a continuous memory region in wasm app's point of view while in the native it can consist of multiple shared heaps (each of which is a continuous memory region). For example, one 500MB shared heap 1 and one 500 MB shared heap 2 form a chain, in Wasm's point of view, it's one 1GB shared heap.
After these enhancements, the data sharing between wasm apps, and between hosts can be more efficient and flexible. Admittedly shared heap management can be more complex for users, but it's similar to the zero-overhead principle. No overhead will be imposed for the users who don't use the shared heap enhancement or don't use the shared heap at all.
* return valid graph and execution context instead of using stack garbage.
(always 0 for now because we don't implement multiple graph/context
for this backend.)
* validate user-given graph and execution context values. reject
invalid ones.
It is reported as "Multiplication result converted to larger type".
And "Multiplication result may overflow 'Type A' before it is
converted to 'Type B'." Type A is a larger type than Type B.
Since the conversion applies after the multiplication, arithmetic
overflow may still occur.
> The rule flags every multiplication of two non-constant integer expressions
> that is (explicitly or implicitly) converted to a larger integer type. The
> conversion is an indication that the expression would produce a result that
> would be too large to fit in the smaller integer type.
* Revert "Improve spec test execution by adding retry logic for transient errors (#4393)"
This reverts commit 64cafaff1e.
* Revert "Add error handling for sgx ci (#4222)"
This reverts commit 8ad47897d1.
* wamr-wasi-extensions: separate test scripts
also, allow to specify the prefix directory.
for the convenience of the CI.
* CI: build wamr-wasi-extensions
fragments are copied from compilation_on_macos.yml.
(thus intel copyright notice)
the motivations:
* make the actual input size available to the backends.
(currently the backends have to make a guess from shape/type.)
* make the host logic look a bit similar to wasi_ephemeral_nn.
this is a backend api/abi change.
* Fix vector growth check and typos in core (#9)
* Fix resource cleanup in memory and running modes tests (#10)
* Add end of file empty line in wasm_running_modes_test.cc
- Change `WAMR_ENABLE_COPY_CALLSTACK` to `WAMR_BUILD_COPY_CALL_STACK`, as
`WAMR_BUILD` is the prefix for a command line option.
- Change `WAMR_ENABLE_COPY_CALLSTACK` to `WASM_ENABLE_COPY_CALL_STACK`, as
`WASM_ENABLE` is the prefix for a macro in the source code.
- Change `CALLSTACK` to `CALL_STACK` to align with the existing
`DUMP_CALL_STACK` feature.
- Continue using `WASMCApiFrame` instead of `wasm_frame_t` outside of
*wasm_c_api.xxx* to avoid a typedef redefinition warning, which is
identified by Clang.
it should be byte size, not the number of (fp32) values.
i'm ambivalent about how to deal with the compatibility for
the legacy wamr-specific "wasi_nn". for now, i avoided changing it.
(so that existing tests using the legacy abi, namely test_tensorflow.c
and test_tensorflow_quantized.c, passes as they are.)
if we have any users who still want to use the legacy abi,
i suppose they consider the compatibility is more important
than the consistency with other backends.
cf. https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/issues/4376
* wasi-nn: fix context lifetime issues
use the module instance context api instead of trying to roll
our own with a hashmap. this fixes context lifetime problems mentioned in
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/issues/4313.
namely,
* wasi-nn resources will be freed earlier now. before this change,
they used to be kept until the runtime shutdown. (wasm_runtime_destroy)
after this change, they will be freed together with the associated
instances.
* wasm_module_inst_t pointer uniqueness assumption (which is wrong
after wasm_runtime_deinstantiate) was lifted.
as a side effect, this change also makes a context shared among threads
within a cluster. note that this is a user-visible api/abi breaking change.
before this change, wasi-nn "handles" like wasi_ephemeral_nn_graph were
thread-local. after this change, they are shared among threads within
a cluster, similarly to wasi file descriptors. spec-wise, either behavior
should be ok simply because wasi officially doesn't have threads yet.
althogh i feel the latter semantics is more intuitive, if your application
depends on the thread-local behavior, this change breaks your application.
tested with wamr-wasi-extensions/samples/nn-cli, modified to
call each wasi-nn operations on different threads. (if you are
interested, you can find the modification at
https://github.com/yamt/wasm-micro-runtime/tree/yamt-nn-wip-20250619.)
cf.
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/issues/4313https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/issues/2430
* runtime_lib.cmake: enable WAMR_BUILD_MODULE_INST_CONTEXT for wasi-nn
as we do for wasi (WAMR_BUILD_LIBC_WASI)
currently this is not necessary because context (WASINNContext) is
local to instance. (wasm_module_instance_t)
i plan to make a context shared among instances in a cluster when
fixing https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/issues/4313.
this is a preparation for that direction.
an obvious alternative is to tweak the module instance context APIs
to allow declaring some kind of contexts instance-local. but i feel,
in this particular case, it's more natural to make "wasi-nn handles"
shared among threads within a "process".
note that, spec-wise, how wasi-nn behaves wrt threads is not defined
at all because wasi officially doesn't have threads yet. i suppose, at
this point, that how wasi-nn interacts with wasi-threads is something
we need to define by ourselves, especially when we are using an outdated
wasi-nn version.
with this change, if a thread attempts to access a context while
another thread is using it, we simply make the operation fail with
the "busy" error. this is intended for the mimimum serialization to
avoid problems like crashes/leaks/etc. this is not intended to allow
parallelism or such.
no functional changes are intended at this point yet.
cf.
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/issues/4313https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/issues/2430
